Here is the smallest bit I can summarize it as. The TLDR gospel.
There is a Creator who loves you, who longs to see you live your life to its utmost potential, who knows how you can achieve this, who wants to help you achieve it. The problem is we don’t know this. I don’t think we can know it outside of our Creator revealing it to us. The Creator Himself became incarnate among us who values personal intimate relations with us, to teach these truths to us, to ransom us, to be personally involved in seeing we are rescued, this truth was revealed to us, our mistakes have been corrected, our guilt removed and we are now back to square one plus. Because in square one, we had not yet sinned, we loved others, we blessed others and the rest of His creation. But we didn’t have the revelation of who our Creator fully is and how much He loves us, and how all credit belongs to Him. But in square one plus (aka heaven), we now have the revelation, the transforming salvation.
TLDR/
I’m not trying to ‘water down’ the gospel to make it more receptive or less offensive. But I think it could be beneficial to view from a ‘non-biblical’ perspective. I do believe the Scriptures and Holy Spirit has revealed the truths I believe and am about to expand on, but I believe I can describe it with out using Scripture, which could be very beneficial to those who don’t believe in the Bible. Most who don’t believe the Bible are turned off by those quoting the Bible or the circular logic used to convince them the Bible is true. But I feel they might be more receptive to biblical/universal truths without referring to the Bible, even though most of it I believe parallels the Bible.Though I think this approach could help and Christian to see from a different than common perspective, I believe it is a good approach for and monotheistic person or agnostic. Even an atheist might find it intriguing or refreshing to view from. For those unfamiliar with the Bible, I will give some references to concepts from it more than specific verses to parallel to this other perspective that anyone can relate to regardless of religion.
You would have to convince the hearer that there is a divine/supernatural being.
I know there are many atheist who are way more educated and knowledgeable than I am, even about the content of the Bible. I’m not foolish enough to attempt to prove God or persuade to anyone else He exist. Even i could convince them, it’s pointless. Satan and his angels know God exists and everything Jesus did. They just don’t want Gods will. They want it done their way.
But I wouldn’t use science or history to attempt to prove anything either. However I might appeal to the philosophy. If there is a God who created and controls all, then all credit is belongs to Him. If He didn’t, then clearly no credit does. But then who does it belong to? Is everything just chance? Nothing is eternal, it’s all meaningless. I just don’t get atheism from a philosophical standpoint.
One who created everything and sustains everything. This Being cares for most of His creation, but very deeply for the humans, the creation created to represent the Being. This Creator is so full of love and relationship between the 3 of them, it overflows out, into humans. Love is summed up into elevating the needs of others above your own. You would have to delve into Scripture to see the willing complementary submission demonstrated by 3 different Persons into 1 Being, but not necessary for this view.So this Being was created out of overflowing love, to be love and to care for the rest of creation, giving up oneself to benefit the non-self and to trust the One who created them. In loving/benefiting others, it is actually that person who is benefited. It is the Creator, who designed it this way, that gets all the credit or glory. So when the human loves others and trusts the Creator, the Creator and human is benefiting. Like an downhill snowball effect of ever building love and glory.
But what happens when the human no longer trusts their Creator? They think they are doing a great job, such a good job blessing the rest of creation and their pride builds up. The forget to give credit for their ability to love and bless and even forget where the love they had came from. Or they think their purpose or value is in the act blessing of creation.
We have a very transactional and purpose driven mindset. It could be possible that this Creator just wants to be with us at times or the watch us enjoy the others or His blessings. We don’t exist as a commodity whose only purpose is to expend/expel love on others to the point of exhaustion of machine like certainty. But representatives of our Creator, we love to make art, to create, to laugh and sing. So we could even think we don’t need a relationship with our Creator, we got this. He gave us unlimited supply or nutrients and strength, we can accomplish anything, and it’s our goal/purpose to accomplish it. And now that we have a mission, we don’t even need that Creator’s guidance or a relationship at all, just the provisions…
The “original sin” is credited with the eating of a forbidden fruit and that I think is one of the reasons for viewing sin as an act or transgression. Something that occurred or was done that ‘dirties’ us, so we require a cleaning. We cannot clean ourselves so we need someone pure to sacrifice and apply that to clean us. Biblically speaking, this makes sense. Much of Scripture has multiple accounts and different narratives to support this. You could argue all of the times that pre dates the incarnation of Jesus on earth is an orchestrated for the final crescendo of the cross and resurrection was written for the crescendo. Sin is a thing and it causes issues that need to be dealt with, dirt that requires cleaning. It is preached like there was a perfect painting from God, and sin ruins that painting. Try as hard as we can, we cannot erase it or fix the painting, so God sends His Son to restore the painting and allows us to credit the restored or new perfect painting as if it was ours.Another common analogy is we were with God, we sinned, now we are separated from God. There is a gap between us to large for anyone to bridge, so Jesus bridged it for us.
My main problem with these analogies is that it is framed as us desiring an favorable outcome. We can’t do it, but He did it for us. Salvation is used to speak of getting to the other side or back with God. Or salvation from a potential punishment.Why did we want to be with God. Was it because of the blessings on His side. So do we want the healer or the healing? It’s actually quite selfish and self centered. Delayed gratification. I can ‘suffer’ now because you get rewarded later.
I believe the perspective I explained above is a more rich understanding. That we are all dead, we need a resurrection. We don’t have a saving revelation, no hope or reason to exist. Now I know quite a few Christian’s (many that I look up to) that academically might use the ‘traditional’ gospel mostly because the haven’t reflected much upon what they actually believe. But I see obvious fruit of the love of God in them and the desire to do His will. So I’m not intending to discredit those who do use the Bible to share the gospel or speak of it in the traditional sense. This is just another perspective that might help someone who is reflective and finds a lot of cognitive dissonance in the traditional narrative.I don’t disagree with many of those facets either, but one perspective that is mentioned many times throughout the Scriptures is the relationship between a father and a son. Most of this explanation is from this perspective. The father doesn’t need suffering, the father just wants to fix/help the son live to their potential.
So back to pride, not trusting or needing or crediting God. Before that act of eating the forbidden fruit, I would say their was sin or pride. Jesus even says if a man has thoughts of anger is guilty of murder or thoughts of lust is guilty of adultery. I do believe God could snap His fingers and all sin could be forgiven and all dirt cleaned. I do believe God could stop the hand of a knife murder moments before impact (like He did to spare Isaac from Abraham). But stopping that act (if it was attempted murder born from hate) would not fix the hate. What if sin was not just an act or a bad thing added on that needed to be undone or a stain on a perfect painting that needed erased.
First, there are 2 categories or sins. Sins of omission and sins of commission. Committing the wrong thing like a murder. Or failing to do the correct thing, like blessing others. Remember love is blessing others above yourself. If that is what you were designed to do, it is Gods will for you to do, and you don’t do the will of God, that is a sin. Either of these are ‘actions’ that ruin the perfect painting. It all stops the never ending snowball of blessing, glory and love.This is where trust and a relationship with your Creator is required. To know when we are called to bless others or enjoy our blessings. That discretion given to us, should we pour incredibly expensive oil n Jesus’ feet? Or sell it and feed the poor. Enjoy the fruits of our labor. Or give to others? Its not an obvious black and white answer. It can be an insult if one gives you a gift and you regift it? Or if they want you to relax and you keep working. God does want us to be generous and give sacrificially, but He gives so much (my cup overflowith) it’s impossible to give it all away. And a relationship with Him, He will give you guidance on what to do. I believe it is a difficult or unknowable decision to make for a good reason. So we can continue to trust and have a relationship with God, to trust Him for the answers and give Him credit for the outcome and process. If it was black and white, we might think we don’t need Him, we know what to do.
As a parent, when my child commits a bad act, or omits doing a correct act that should have been done, I am not troubled by the thing they did or didn’t do. Example if I tell them not to play with a ball in the house and to give to others. (Assuming I was a perfect parent which I am no where near). One day the play with the ball in the house and break something. Things are cheap, I really don’t care that the thing is broke I can buy a new one. What if they break a friends gift to me or something I was borrowing, what if that thing had great sentimental value to them and is irreplaceable? Now I would feel bad for the person hurt and try to console them. There are short term ‘fixes’ that can be done. Or if there was an opportunity to buy a neighbor an ice cream they couldn’t afford buy my child could. They didn’t even bother to ask me if they should or not, they just simply didn’t buy it for their neighbor. The priests and Israelites had a ‘short term’ fix. They would sacrifice a perfect lamb. It might not erase the dark blot on the painting, but it was deemed acceptable by the owner for the time. In that no more payment or fix was needed for that which was atoned for.Then Jesus comes and provides a forever fix. Though you can’t technically fix an unperfected perfection. Jesus does the next best thing, He makes a new perfect painting, and allows us to have this perfection credited towards us if we believe. But even that doesn’t really do much different than God snapping His fingers to create a new perfect painting and just crediting it to us if we ask Him too.
We see it was God’s will to crush Jesus. It was basically God’s way of demonstrating how much He loves us. I willing to do anything and every to rescue those that want it. Leaving the 99 to find the 1. And all of the OT was orchestrated for this reason. To have a priest, one to intermediate between God and us, to atone for the blot on His perfection, to personally be involved to ensure to redemption of His people like in Egypt. (Side note, that is what ransomed means, to be be personally involved with the rescue. Not to send servant, or order someone does it, but you care so much to be personally involved that it gets done. The Israelites weren’t bought back, God never paid them money to get them back. In fact they took a ton of money with them from their captors). To teach/fix us the meaning and purpose of our lives is to love others, to elevate anyone and everyone above ourselves, to teach us this can only be done correctly when we trust God and have an ongoing, intimate relationship with God so as to help us discern what to do when. To conquer the powers or darkness and demonstrate God’s power, His seemingly opposite power to what we know as power.
All of these facets were the reason Jesus came, and it when all these facets are realized that we can even attempt to begin to try to perceive the beauty and wonder of the diamond of who our Creator is!
But in the big picture, I would be most upset at my child not living up to their potential. There is a problem that needs fixed. I would not require a punishment or suffering or sacrificial suffering in place of my child. I don’t want to stop the murder, I want to fix the hate. It is when we realize the truth of who our loving Creator is, that is the transforming salvation as I see it. He wants to fix us, but He can’t by just stopping our bad actions or covering them up, or making a new perfection and crediting that to us. But to transform our mind/heart and motives. To show us, not just educate us, that we were designed to love others and glorify Him. And that in loving others He is glorified. The never ending snowball reinstated. Once that is fixed/corrected, then yes, there was a perfect painting that needs renewed/repaired.
There was a physical act that has consequences that needs dealt with. There is a guilt we have when we finally understand the most horrendous things we did. And our loving God doesn’t want that guilt and provided a tangible way to allow us to feel relieved of that guilt. So having a slightly more Biblical understanding, do you see the parallels in my first TLDR gospel.
There is a Creator who loves you, who longs to see you live your life to its utmost potential, who knows how you can achieve this, who wants to help you achieve it. The problem is we don’t know this. I don’t think we can know it outside of our Creator revealing it to us. The Creator Himself became incarcerate among us who values personal intimate relations with us, to teach these truths to us, to ransom us, to be personally involved in seeing we are rescued, this truth was revealed to us, our mistakes have been corrected, our guilt removed and we are now back to square one plus. Because in square one, we had not yet sinned, we loved others, we blessed others and the rest of His creation. But we didn’t have the revelation of who our Creator fully is and how much He loves us, and how all credit belongs to Him. But in square one plus (aka heaven), we now have the revelation.